IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 183 of 2014 Date of decision 25.08.2025. Dev Kaur & others ...Petitioners. Versus Kuldeep Kaur & others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : None. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (oral): The comments from the learned District Judge, Bilaspur have been received in compliance to order dated 4.8.2025. I am satisfied from the explanation rendered by the learned District Judge, Bilaspur that the omission in not complying with the interim order passed by this Court had not been intentional and on account conduct of bonafide belief. 2. Even otherwise, learned counsel for the petitioners, has made a prayer for withdrawal of the petition, having been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments. The prayer is allowed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 25th August, 2025 Judge (kck)