Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9340 (UTT)

KAMAL JOSHI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/795/2024 · 2025-06-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.795 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Anand Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma and Mr. Nivesh Bahuguna, Advocates for respondent no.4. 4. Learned State counsel submitted that after investigation a charge sheet dated 06.11.2024 has been submitted against the petitioner, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the submission made by counsel for the State, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.06.2025 SK