Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9340 (PNJ)

PRABHDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/72044/2025 · 2026-09-10

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-72044-2025 (O&M) Date of decision :10.09.2026 PRABHDEEP SINGH ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in case bearing FIR No.45 dated 21.02.2025 registered under Sections 315(2), 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Section 24 of Immigration Act at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala, Haryana. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 25.02.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The learned State counsel on instructions admits the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case. In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 25.02.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on JITESH LAL 2026.09.11 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-72044-2025 (O&M) -2- joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 10.09.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.09.11 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document