Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9339 (UTT)

SUBHASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND SSP HARIDWAR

WPCRL/1497/2022 · 2025-07-07

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1634 of 2022 With WPCRL No.1497 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Hemant Singh Mahra, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the parties made a statement at Bar that after investigation, a final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners. 5. This fact is further authenticated by the learned State Counsel by supplying instructions in writing to this Court. The instructions are taken on record. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing survives in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition is closed. 7. Separate order be provided to the learned counsel for the parties in both petitions. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 07.07.2025 Ravi