HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10952 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for following relief: "Direct the court of learned court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC Prayagraj to decide Original Suit No. 435 of 2012 (Amrit Lal and others versus Dayaram and others) pending since 27.04.2012 before Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC Prayagraj within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2012. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunita Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dayaram .....Petitioner(s) Amrit Lal And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 10952 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad