SUKHDEV SINGH @ SUKHCHAIN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/49773/2024 · 2025-08-04
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93372 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93372 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRM-M-49773-2024
219
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-49773-2024 Decided on:04.08.2025
Sukhdev Singh @ Sukhchain Singh
.... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr. M.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Simran Goria, AAG, Punjab.
****
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)
1.
This petition has been filed praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.238 dated 23.11.2023 registered under Sections 302, 307, 332, 333, 353, 186, 148, 149 and 120-B IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of Arms Act at Police Station Sultanpur Lodhi District Kapurthala.
2.
Vide order dated 16.01.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join the investigation.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to
order dated 16.01.2025, petitioner has joined the investigation and as such his interim bail may be made absolute.
4.
Learned State counsel, on instructions, affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigation.
SONIA BURA 2025.08.05 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CRM-M-49773-2024
5.
In view of the above, interim order dated 16.01.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.
6.
Petition stands allowed.
04.08.2025
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) sonia
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No
SONIA BURA 2025.08.05 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document