Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No.225 of 2024
------
1. Budheshwar Gope; aged about 54 years;
2. Ram Chandra Gope; aged about 46 years; Both sons of Late Ranga Gope @ Ranga Gour, residents of Moharda Bastee, P.O.- Luabasa, P.S.- Birsa Nagar, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum;
… Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum;
3. Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum;
4. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum;
5. Assistant Settlement Officer, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum;
6. Circle Officer, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Parsudih, District- East Singhbum;
7. Tata Steel Ltd., Jamshepdur, P.O. & P.S.- Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Ravi Kerketta, SC-VI
Ms. Deepika Jojowar, AC to SC-VI For the rest Op. Parties : Mr. Gunendra Mohan Mishra, Advocate
------
Order No:-05 Dated:-24-01-2025
Heard the parties.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 29.02.2024.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated
29.02.2024. It is next submitted that W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 was listed
before this Bench and no one turned up on behalf of the petitioners when W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 was called out; which resulted in dismissal of the said W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 for non-prosecution vide order dated
29.02.2024. It is next submitted that non-prosecution of W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 before this court was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list W.P.(C). No.7254 of 2016 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/