IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82103 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Bishwajeet Kumar Singh @ Bishwajeet Kumar Son of Jitendra Singh R/o House No. - 60, Haripur, Dhansar Bera, Dist. - Dhanbad(Jharkhand), Pin Code. - 828106. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 09-12-2025 Heard Mr. Alok Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 433 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution in short, is that from the coaching institute of this petitioner, a huge number of booklets were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner runs a coaching institute and those booklets were for weekly mock tests. It has also been submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82103 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 that from perusal of the FIR, it is not clear as to whether the booklets were used one or they are to be used in the future. He also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that there is the name of the candidate on the booklets. This goes to show that these booklets were used one. Save and except the booklets, nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that his rivals have got this case filed against him. The petitioner is the simple owner of a coaching, having no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.07.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 433 of 2025. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T