The State rep by its Sub Inspector of Police, v. Jeelani
SUO MOTU TR/2987/2025 · 2025-09-08
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93357 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93357 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Suo Motu TR.No.2987 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu TR.No.2987 of 2025 (CC.No.9309 of 2019 of X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore Taluk, Chennai) The State Rep by its Sub Inspector of Police, Crime Kodungaiyur Police Station, Chennai – 600 118. ... Petitioner Vs. Jeelani .... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER This Suo Motu case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.)No.618 of 2025.
2. This case is registered for alleged offences under Sections 379 of IPC. The allegation is that the accused stolen the gold chain of the defacto complainant. However, the property involved has been recovered and handed Page No.1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Suo Motu TR.No.2987 of 2025 over to the defacto complainant. However, the summons is not served on the accused.
3. Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the antecedents of the accused, the reason for absence from his usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the summons could not be served, it is evident that even if the accused is brought to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial. Due to the passage of time, a meaningful trial is unlikely, and no useful purpose would be served.
4. Accordingly, the case in CC.No.9309 of 2019 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore Taluk, Chennai stands quashed and this Suo Motu Transfer case is disposed of. 08.09.2025 rap Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed /
disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. Page No.2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Suo Motu TR.No.2987 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. rap Suo Motu TR.No.2987 of 2025 08.09.2025 Page No.3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis