Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[256]
Surinder Kumar
Vijay Shankar Yadav
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ JAIN
[1]
the following [2]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-6192 Date of Decision :
Surinder Kumar
versus Vijay Shankar Yadav
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
None for the appellant. Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate
*** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
On 20.11.2018 while issuing notice of motion, this Court passed the following order:-
“
Learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal on merits. It is however submitted that the appellant is ready and willing to return a sum of Rs.20 lakh as well as some amount as damages to the respondent within three (03) months.
Notice of motion, at this stage, to the limited extent as above, for 14.12.2018. Dasti only.”
On 14.12.2018, following order was passed by this Court:
“
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that possibility of an amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties needs to be explored.
Let this matter be placed before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediator on
20.12.2018. List on 07.05.2019 to await report of the Mediator.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6192-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.03.2025
…Appellant
….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN for the respondent. On 20.11.2018 while issuing notice of motion, this Court passed
Learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal on merits. It is however submitted that the appellant is ready and willing to return a sum of Rs.20 lakh as well as some amount as damages to the respondent within three (03) months. Notice of motion, at this stage, to the limited extent as above, On 14.12.2018, following order was passed by this Court:-
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that possibility of an amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties needs to be Let this matter be placed before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. ed to appear before the Mediator on List on 07.05.2019 to await report of the Mediator.”
On 20.11.2018 while issuing notice of motion, this Court passed
Learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal on merits. It is however submitted that the appellant is ready and willing to return a sum of Rs.20 lakh as well as some amount as Notice of motion, at this stage, to the limited extent as above,
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that possibility of an amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties needs to be Let this matter be placed before the Mediation and ed to appear before the Mediator on RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.03.28 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-6192
[3]
[4]
is the case today. [5]
27.03.2025 ‘R. Sharma'
6192-2018 (O&M)
Mediation between the parties has failed.
None appeared on behalf of the appellant on 14.11.2019. Same the case today.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
27.03.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
-2- Mediation between the parties has failed. None appeared on behalf of the appellant on 14.11.2019. Same prosecution.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
None appeared on behalf of the appellant on 14.11.2019. Same RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.03.28 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document