Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93339 (PNJ)

LALIT BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/24757/2025 · 2025-08-26

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-24757-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 LALIT BHARDWAJ STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Rakesh Sobti for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to ACP for the post of TGT Social Science Master 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the claim for grant of LTC/HTC for the block year 2024 fresh representation to that effect to the second respondent Secondary Educati 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner regarding second ACP respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent is directed to decide the pending Annexure P-15 5. Notice of motion. 6. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: LALIT BHARDWAJ Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to grant the petitioner benefit of second the post of TGT Social Science Master Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the claim for grant of LTC/HTC for the block year 2024-27 fresh representation to that effect to the second respondent Education. Ordered accordingly. Learned counsel for the petitioner second ACP is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case is directed to decide the pending 15, in a specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24757-2025 Date of Decision: 26.08.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia, seeking a writ of grant the petitioner benefit of second the post of TGT Social Science Master. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the claim for 27, and seeks liberty to make a fresh representation to that effect to the second respondent/Director, Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that grievance is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case the third is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 18.06.2025, Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, /State and submits that the pending seeking a writ of grant the petitioner benefit of second Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the claim for seeks liberty to make a /Director, submits that grievance is pending for appropriate decision before the third , , the pending Aman Dua 2025.08.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-24757-2025 legal notice, dated respondent/Director, order in accordance with law within 7. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 8. Ordered 9. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 26.08.2025 Ad 2025 -2- , dated 18.06.2025, will be decided by Director, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable will be decided by the third by passing a speaking/reasoned a period of three months. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No third /reasoned rned counsel for the petitioner In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.08.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document