Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9331 (UTT)

NASIR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1606/2023 · 2025-04-25

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3130 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1606/2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Ankuh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Devendra Kumar, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been acquitted by the learned Trial Court in Case Crime No. 96 of 2019, for the offence under Sections 363,366,376(2 of IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, hence this Bail Application has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Bail Application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 25.04.2025 Kaushal 2025:UHC:3130