SHRI RAM CREATIONS v. CG STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
WPC/936/2025 · 2025-02-18
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9331 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9331 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:8289
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 936 of 2025 1 - Shri Ram Creations Through- Proprietor Akash Jaiswal Aged 34 Years, S/o Shri Kailash Kumar Jaiswal, At- B- 11, H.B. C. Katchana, Raipur, ( C.G. ).
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Cg State Industrial Development Corporation Limited Through- Chief General Manager ( Marketing ), At- 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road, No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, ( C.G. ). 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Dpo Bilaspur, Women And Child Development Department, Bilaspur, ( C.G. ).
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Akash Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Shri Abhijeet Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent no. 2. : Shri R.K. Gupta, Addl. Advocate General. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.02.19 16:19:43 +0530
2
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 18.02.2025
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent No.2 for payment of the balance amount Rs.98,17,500/- plus the taxes as applicable towards the supply of plastic items as per supply order dated 24.05.2023.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that pursuance to the Rate Contract, the respondent No.2 issued a supply order dated 24.05.2023 to the petitioner for supply of 3850 pieces each of 30 and 80 litre food Grain/Water storage plastic containers with lid total 7700 pieces. The petitioner supplied the plastics articles to the respondents, however, the final payment towards his final bill has not been made by the respondent No.2 till date. He further submits that he has already moved a representation dated 04.01.2025 to the respondent No.2, but no steps has been taken on the representation filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the State/respondent submits that if the amount is not in dispute and the petitioner has already supplied the articles as per the said supply order, the respondent No.2 will verify and examine the same, thereafter, necessary steps will be taken to release the payment as claimed by the petitioner.
4. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the pleadings.
3
5. Having considered the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, particularly considering that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the respondent No.2/DPO Bilaspur, Women & Child Development Department, Bilaspur (C.G.), it is
directed that the respondent No.2 verify and examine the claim raised by the petitioner and if the articles as per the supply order dated 24.05.2023 has already been supplied by the petitioner, the undisputed balance amount be released to the petitioner within a period of fifty days from today.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is
disposed of. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib