Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93308 (PNJ)

HARISH KUMAR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BATHINDA AND OTHERS

CWP/24113/2025 · 2025-08-21

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CWP-24113-2025 Date of Decision : August 21, 2025 HARISH KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BATHINDA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Bhargav, Advocate and Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The issue brought before this Court through the present writ of quo warranto is that the Deputy Commissioner concerned lacks the jurisdiction to decide matters relating to eviction from property. Accordingly, the petitioner asserts the right to invoke the writ of quo warranto. 2. Although the learned counsel for the petitioner joined the issue of maintainability of this writ petition and addressed arguments, after arguing for some time, he sought leave to withdraw this writ petition. However, he prayed for liberty to raise all the pleas, claims, and issues urged before this Court, before the authority, which is seized of the matter. DEVINDER YADAV 2025.08.21 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-24113-2025 2 3. Leave granted. 4. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed off as withdrawn, however, with liberty (supra). (KULDEEP TIWARI) August 21, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.08.21 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment