Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93300 (ALL)

VIJAY BAHADUR v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/13446/2025 · 2025-09-09

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13446 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ved Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the State- respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus to command respondent no.3 to consider restoration of pension of the petitioner on the pay scale he would have drawn but for punishment of withholding two years' increment, which too has lapsed. 3. It is argued that since the period of two years have expired, therefore, pension of the petitioner should be restored. He submits that in this regard petitioner has already represented the matter and recommendation for which has been made by the Superindent of Police, Fatehpur to the Finance Controller U.P. Police Headquarters, Lucknow on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Keshav Sharma, Ved Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vijay Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 03.06.2025 but till date no decision has been taken. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that respondent no.3 may be directed to take final decision in the matter of claim of the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent no.3 to take final decision in the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. September 10, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 13446 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad