Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93267 (MAD)

N.PRASANTH v. The Commissioner of Police

CRL OP/24108/2025 · 2025-09-02

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.24108 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.09.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.24108 of 2025 N.Prasanth ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police (North), Anna Nagar Saragam, Chennai-600 040. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Chennai-600 1010. 4.The Inspector of Police, V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to transfer the Investigation in Crime No.194 of 2025 on the file of the fourth respondent police to any other competent agency. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Kruthika For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja, GA (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.24108 of 2025 O R D E R This petition is filed seeking a direction to transfer the Investigation in Crime No.194 of 2025 on the file of the fourth respondent police to any other competent agency. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the accused was an employee of the petitioner's travel agency and had misappropriated a sum of Rs.30 lakhs and also committed theft. He further submitted that despite FIR has been filed, the police has not taken any steps to conduct proper investigation on the matter. Hence, the present Petition. 4. The learned Government Advocate on instructions submitted that, even at the time of remand, the learned Judicial Magistrate perused the entire documents produced by the de-facto complainant and even in that there was no allegations made against the accused and hence, she has been released on own bond. He also submitted that the documents produced by the petitioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.24108 of 2025 was also perused by the investigating officer. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and the submissions made on either side, this Court directs the petitioner to produce all the relevant documents to the investigating officer, who in turn, shall investigate the matter and file the report and shall proceed further as per law, as any offence is found as against the accused. 6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 02.09.2025 DP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.24108 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police (North), Anna Nagar Saragam, Chennai-600 040. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Chennai-600 1010. 4.The Inspector of Police, V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. 5.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.24108 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR.J, DP Crl.O.P.No.24108 of 2025 02.09.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis