Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9326 (UTT)

ANEES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1291/2025 · 2025-07-29

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 1291 of 2025 Anees ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Susheel Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.508 of 2024, under Section 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progency Act, 2007, Police Station Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail. 4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 29.07.2025 Ravi Bisht