Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32286 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated August 20, 2025 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the Executive Engineer, Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, Deoria being the respondent No.2 herein is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned demand notice dated August 13, 2024.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Mani, Sugandha Yadav, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Pravesh Kushwaha .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad