RADHEY LAL v. SRI RAKESH KUMAR SINGH, THE THEN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/4911/2025 · 2025-09-08
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4911 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Sudheer Rana, learned counsel for applicant and learned Standing Counsel for opposite party.
2. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by counsel for applicant.
3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed.
4. File is consigned to the record. September 9, 2025 Monika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudheer Rana, Vikram Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Radhey Lal .....Applicant(s) Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, The Then District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad