Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9324 (BOM)

M.P. ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROP MOHSIN WAJED KHAN PATHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

WP/2303/2025 · 2025-03-03

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29 WP NO. 2303 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2303 OF 2025 M.P. ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROP MOHSIN WAJED KHAN PATHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham S. Khoche AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. V. M. Kagne Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. Swapnil Joshi i/by J. P. Legal Associates … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 03.03.2025 PER COURT : . Issue notice to respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Joshi waives service of notice for respondent Nos. 3 and 4/Municipal Council. 2. We have heard both sides. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation addressed to them from time to time, which raises the issue regarding the release 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:6166-DB 29 WP NO. 2303 OF 2025 of drain water into the reservoir and its effect on the petitioner’s contractual fishing rights, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within six (06) weeks. 4. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion or taken any view in respect of the rights inter se between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 3 and 4 based on the fishing contract. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2