Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9324 (AP)

Addala Nagarvenkata Prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5947/2025 · 2025-08-21

Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010103122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRISDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION No. Between: Addala Naga Venkata Prasad,S/o.Tatarao, aged about 54 years, Working as PH Worker, Amalapuram Municipality, R/o.D.No.1–5–3, Savaram, Amalapuram Mandal, Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District, AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District, and two others. Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for Respondents Counsel for Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.5947 OF 2025 Addala Naga Venkata Prasad,S/o.Tatarao, aged about 54 years, Working as PH Worker, Amalapuram Municipality, 3, Savaram, Amalapuram Mandal, Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District, and three others. ...Petitioner radesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, MA & UD Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.P.Raghavender Reddy Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: Mr.R.S.Manidhar Pingali, Assistant Government Pleader No.3 : Ms.Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Standing Counsel IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA ...Petitioners rep. by its Principal Secretary, MA & UD Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur ...Respondents Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, 2 WP_5947_2025 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J) The present writ petition is filed alleging non–implementation of the orders of the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad in O.A. Nos.7826, 7823, 7821 and 7819 of 2011, dated 14.11.2011. Challenging the said orders, the Government filed Writ Petition Nos.32957, 33016, 33143 and 33157 of 2012 and the same were allowed by the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad by orders dated 26.11.2012 against which the petitioners filed Review WPMP Nos.16071, 16074, 20819 and 20821 of 2012 and the said review petitions were allowed by orders dated 25.9.2018 and in consequence thereof the Writ Petitions filed by the Government were dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the State carried the matters to the Hon’ble apex Court vide Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.7402 – 7405 of 2024, 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners while stating that the said SLPs came up for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court along with SLP (C) No.13813 of 2018 and batch, submits that the same were dismissed by common judgment dated 23.7.2024. He submits that in view of the orders of the Hon’ble apex Court dismissing the SLPs filed in respect of the present petitioners, the orders of the Tribunal dated 14.10.2011 were confirmed. He further submits that taking all these aspects into account, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.151, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (D) Department, dated 31.7.2025 according permission to the respondent No.2 to implement the orders with regard to retrospective regularization of services of NMRs/Daily wage workers etc., i.e., from the date of completion of five (5) years of their services, whose services were regularized as per G.O.Ms. No.212, Finance & Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, dated 22.4.1994 and to sanction allowances etc. He submits that in view of the said G.O., a copy 3 WP_5947_2025 of which is placed on record, no further adjudication is required in this matter. 3. Recording the said submissions, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J August 22, 2025 vasu