HARE KRISHNA COLLEGE BHANKARI ALIGARH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/31872/2025 · 2025-09-11
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31872 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.7.2023, 22.11.2024 and 24.7.2025 and refund the fee to the petitioner. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.7.2023, 22.11.2024 and 24.7.2025 and refund the fee to the petitioner within stipulated period."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3 have vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but have not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, Sri Ravi Prakash, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vivek Kumar Rai Hare Krishna College Bhankari Aligarh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
nos.2 & 3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 15 days from the date of production of certified copy of this
order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, Registrar, Dr. Bheem Rao Ambedkar Vishwavidyalaya, Agra is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is
disposed of. September 12, 2025 Atul WRIC No. 31872 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad