Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9323 (AP)

Bhuma Akhila Priya, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6349/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010102512020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT Between: 1. Bhuma Akhila Priya,, D/o late Bhuma Nagi Reddy, aged about 29 years, Occ- Ex-Minister, R/o. H.No. 8 Kurnool District-518543. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat,Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head Quarters, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool Distri 4. The Dy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda Division at Allagadda, Kurnool District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withdrawing petitioner security through notice C.No.109/DSB IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6349 OF 2020 1. Bhuma Akhila Priya,, D/o late Bhuma Nagi Reddy, aged about 29 years, Minister, R/o. H.No. 8-1-65,T.V.Road, Allagadda Town 8( Mandal, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat,Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head Quarters, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool. 4. The Dy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda Division at Allagadda, Kurnool ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withdrawing petitioner security through notice C.No.109/DSB-XI/PSOs/2020, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Bhuma Akhila Priya,, D/o late Bhuma Nagi Reddy, aged about 29 years, 65,T.V.Road, Allagadda Town 8( Mandal, ...Petitioner , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home 2. The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Police 4. The Dy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda Division at Allagadda, Kurnool ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in XI/PSOs/2020, dated. 10-02-2020, issued by the 3rd respondent, without any notice or opportunity, enquiry, only on the ground committee reviewed the security, which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law, violation of Articles 21 and in violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the notice C.No.109/DSB-XI/PSOs/2020, dated. 10-02-20201 issued by the 3rd respondent, further direct the respondents herein to continue the security of 2 2 PSOs to the petitioner with all consequential benefits or otherwise petitioner will suffer serious life threat and great hardship IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim suspension of the impugned notice -C.No.109/DSB- XI/PS0s/2020, dated. 10-02-2020, issued by the 3rd respondent, further direct the respondents to continue the security to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6349 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withdrawing petitioner security through notice C.No.109/DSB-XI/PSOs/2020, dated. 10-02-2020, issued by the 3rd respondent, without any notice or opportunity, enquiry, only on the ground committee reviewed the security, which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law, violation of Articles 21 and in violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the notice C.No.109/DSB-XI/PSOs/2020, dated. 10-02-20201 issued by the 3rd respondent, further direct the respondents herein to continue the security of 2 2 PSOs to the petitioner with all consequential benefits or otherwise petitioner will suffer serious life threat and great hardship...…” 2. Heard Sri Challa Siva Sankar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6349 of 2020 Dated.11.09.2025 KKV