IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83713 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- PAWANA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ankit Kumar @ Pampi Son of Santosh Kumar Gupta @ Pappu Resident of Village - Pawna, P.S. - Pawna, District -Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Shrivastava, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-12-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pawna P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 329(4), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is of dismantling household articles of the informant, along with other accused persons. When the same was protested, it is alleged that co-accused Ayush Kumar @ Sethwa assaulted the son of the informant by means of iron rod, whereas, the petitioner has assaulted the daughter of the informant by means of hammer, due to which both of them sustained serious injuries, besides there is allegation of snatching of valuables. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83713 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the informant and the petitioner’s father are full brother and they are bickering over a partition dispute, however, in the heat of rage some scuffle took place, resulting into some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, the injuries, which is allegedly sustained to the informant’s daughter as per his instruction, the same is found to be simple in nature. It is also contended that so far the injury, which is sustained to the informant’s son is concerned, the same is also found to be simple in nature and in this regard, a statement has been made in paragraph nos. 8-9 of the bail application. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application. 6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the relationship between the parties, besides the fair antecedent as well as simple nature of injury, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83713 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 3/3 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Pawna P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. shivank/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T