HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3259 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State as well as Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the learned Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Court no. 4, Saharanpur to decide the Case No. 2569 of 2020, (State Vs. Mustakeem), arising out of Case Crime no. 72 of 2019, Under Section 136 of Indian Electricity Act, P.S.- Titaro, District Saharanpur within a short stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court below concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment.... September 10, 2025 A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Mustakeem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad