IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.83 of 2023 In SECOND APPEAL No.384 of 2011 ====================================================== Om Prakash Choubey, S/o- Late Harinandan Chaubey @ Hari nandan Choubey, R/o- Village- Hemja, P.S. Obra, P.O.- Kurhana, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Akhilesh Choubey S/o - Mithlesh Chaubey R/o- Village- Hemja, P.S. Obra, P.O.- Kurhana, District- Aurangabad. 2. Bhaskar Choubey S/o - Mithlesh Chaubey R/o- Village- Hemja, P.S. Obra, P.o.- Kurhana, District- Aurangabad. 3. Shubham Choubey S/o - Mithlesh Chaubey R/o- Village- Hemja, P.S. Obra, P.o.- Kurhana, District- Aurangabad. 4. Rama Kant Choubey S/o- Late Shiv Narayan Choubey R/o- Village- Hemja, P.S. Obra, P.o.- Kurhana, District- Aurangabad. 5. Gopal Devi alias Parwati Devi, W/o Ram Chandra Tiwari and D/o- Shyam Bihari Choubey Resident of Village-Basdiha.P.S. Hariharganj District- Aurangabad 6. Santosh Choubey S/o- Hari Nandanan Choubey alias Hari Narayan Chubey, all residents of Village-Hemja,P.S.Obera, P.O. Kurhana, District-Aurangabad 7. Kamta Mahto S/o Ram Deni Mahto Residents of Village-Sonahauli, P.S. and P.O. Obra, District-Aurangabad 8. Awadhesh Pandey S/o- Ram Sunder Pandey, Resident of Village- Hemja, P.S.Obera, P.O. Kurhana, District-Aurangabad. 9. Jamuna Choubey, S/o- Dhanukdhari Choubey, Resident of Village- Ratwar,P.S. and P.O. Obra, District-Aurangabad. 10. Naveen Singh S/o- Late Triveni Singh, Resident of Village-Hemja, P.S.Obera, P.O.Kurhana, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 31-10-2025 Earlier, vide order dated 19.09.2025, as a last chance four weeks' further time was granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner for removal of defect(s) as pointed out by the Patna High Court C. REV. No.83 of 2023(4) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 Office but he failed to remove the said defect(s). Since last chance has already been given to the petitioner, there is no reasonable ground to grant further time for removal of defects. The present Civil Review was filed on 23.03.2023 and in spite of giving sufficient time to the petitioner for removal of defects, he failed to remove the same which shows that petitioner has no interest to pursue this matter. 2. Accordingly, the present Civil Review petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T