106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Jagmohan Singh and others State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Advocate for Haryana Pollution Control Board ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Considering the fact that the stone crusher unit which allegedly violated the environmental the writ petition and though application for its impleament is filed specific assertions in r for the petitioners comes up with a prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars and details. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn the with liberty af 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stan 15.09.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25344 Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 Jagmohan Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Advocate for Haryana Pollution Control Board *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) Considering the fact that the stone crusher unit which allegedly violated the environmental laws was not originally impleaded as a party in the writ petition and though application for its impleament is filed specific assertions in respect of the unit are contained therein, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with a prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars and details. Dismissed as withdrawn the with liberty af All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stan (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 25344-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Advocate for Haryana Pollution Control Board. Considering the fact that the stone crusher unit which allegedly was not originally impleaded as a party in the writ petition and though application for its impleament is filed, but no espect of the unit are contained therein, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with a prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars and details. Dismissed as withdrawn the with liberty aforesaid. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Considering the fact that the stone crusher unit which allegedly was not originally impleaded as a party in but no espect of the unit are contained therein, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with a prayer to withdraw the writ petition with RAJESH KUMAR 2025.09.16 15:51 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.