Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31212 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a totally misconceived writ petition wherein the petitioner has approached this Court for adjustment of the payments to be made to the respondent Bank in EMIs.
3. The petitioner should approach the respondent Bank for settlement and/or approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance.
4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. September 16, 2025 DKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satish Chaturvedi (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Bank Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad