HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31130 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the impugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal/revision. Confronted with the said fact, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the time for filing of the appeal is lapsed. However, she prays for withdrawal of the writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail of alternative remedy. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is provided that in case the appeal is preferred within a period of 10 days from today, the same shall be entertained without raising any objection with regard to the limitation. Certified copy of the impugned order, if any, may be returned forthwith after retaining its photostat copy. September 9, 2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akashi Agrawal, Rishabh Pratap Singh Kachhawah Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Anil Bhati @ Anit Bhati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad