Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1798-DB WA No. 200035 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT APPEAL NO.200035 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. B.T. PATIL S/O TAMMANAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAMA LTD, MULAWAD LIFT IRRIGATION SCHEME, DIVISION, NO.4, DEVARA HIPPARAGI, R/O: PLOT NO.723, KAKA KHARKANIS COLONY, MANAGULI ROAD, VIJAYAPURA-586 109
..APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANGANABASAVA B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (SERVICES-A) VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1798-DB WA No. 200035 of 2022
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED, PWD OFFICE ANNEXE BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, K.R CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001.
4.
THE CHIEF ENGINEER DAM ZONE, KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED, ALMATTI TQ. NIDAGUNDI, DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN BASAREDDY, GA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. SANJAY M. JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING A) TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 21.02.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.201916/2021 (S-RES), B) CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW W.P.NO.201916/2021 (S-RES) FILED BY THE APPELLANT HEREIN AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1798-DB WA No. 200035 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal. The said memo reads as under:-
“In the above said Writ Appeal as per the instruction of the undersigned appellant the W.A has been withdrawn as not pressed. The Appellant is not interested to continue the prosecute matter. Therefore, the Appellant prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss this Appeal as withdrawn.”
02. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE KJJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0 CT:SI