APHC010102542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5219/2025 Between: Chavala Venkateswarlu and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Jalla Hemanth Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: The petitioners alleged that the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are pressurizing them to settle the family disputes with the 6 is married to the younger son of the petitioners, and on account of family disputes that arose between t respondent. It is submitted that, at the instance of the 6 respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are interfering with the issue and pressurizing the petitioners to settle the family disputes between their so respondent. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5219/2025 Chavala Venkateswarlu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following Order: The petitioners alleged that the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are pressurizing to settle the family disputes with the 6th respondent. The 6th is married to the younger son of the petitioners, and on account of family disputes that arose between the younger son of the petitioners and the 6 respondent. It is submitted that, at the instance of the 6th respondent, the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are interfering with the issue and pressurizing the petitioners to settle the family disputes between their son and the 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) The petitioners alleged that the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are pressurizing respondent is married to the younger son of the petitioners, and on account of family he younger son of the petitioners and the 6th respondent, the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are interfering with the issue and pressurizing the n and the 6th 2 2. Considering the submissions, there shall be a direction to respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to disturb the peace of the petitioners without following due process of law. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.03.2025 PNS