HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32065 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Pavan Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Mainuddin Ahamad, learned counsel for private respondent. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the prayer to quash the order dated 18.11.2024 and amended order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Muhammadabad Gohana, District Mau, in proceedings under Rule 6-A U.P. Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 1970." 3. Apart from various arguments one of the argument has been raised by counsel for the petitioner that before passing the impugned order, no notice or opportunity of hearing has been provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for private respondent has very fairly admitted the aforesaid fact. 5. From the perusal of the record it transpire that without providing the opportunity of hearing, the impugned order has been passed, hence the impugned orders dated 18.11.2024 & 28.11.2024 are not liable to be sustained and are hereby, quashed. 6. Writ petition stands allowed. 7. The respondent no.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Muhammadabad Gohana, District Mau, is directed to pass afresh order Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pavan Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mainuddin Ahamad Arati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) within a period of three months, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and the petitioner is free to make all his legal and factual submission by filing an affidavit before the respondent no.2. September 15, 2025 S.K. WRIC No. 32065 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad