HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13414 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Sudeep Harkauli, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Purnendu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order passed by the rent authority is appealable under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that as per his instructions an appeal has already been filed before the appropriate forum. 4. Petitioners to pursue their remedy before the appellate forum. Writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, as the appeal has already been filed, the appellate authority is directed to proceed with the appeal and decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. October 9, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Shree Tripathi, Mujtaba Shamim Akhtar, Nandji Prasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Purnendu Kumar Singh, A.S.G.I., C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mohammad Zakir And Another .....Petitioner(s) Sri Arun Kumar Jain And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad