IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 217 of 2024 ------ Secretary, Garmoday Chetna Kendra, through Dr. Savita Banerjee, aged about 50 years, daughter of late Gopal Chandra Banerjee, resident of Chatra, Ward No.5, Post- Chatra, P.S.-Chatra, Dist.-Chatra … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Post-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Dist.-Ranchi 3. Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Post-Namkum, P.S.-Namkum, Dist.-Ranchi 4. Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, Post-Chatra, P.S.-Chatra, Dist.-Chatra 5. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chatra Sub-division, Post- Chatra, P.S.-Chatra, Dist.-Chatra 6. District Education Officer, Chatra, Post-Chatra, P.S.-Chatra, Dist.-Chatra 7. Sanjay Kumar, Principal In charge, Upendra Nath Verma, Inter College, Chatra, P.O. & P.S. & Dist.-Chatra … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Debarsi Mondal, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Mukul Kr. Singh, AC to GP III : Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, GP III : Ms. Rishita Singh, Advocate : Ms. Richa Sanchita, Advocate ------ Order No.05 Dated- 07.03.2025 Heard the parties. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 to its original file. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to oversight and inadvertence, as the case could not be marked in the cause list, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the case was called out and the same resulted in dismissal of W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 and unless W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List W.P. (C) No. 08 of 2017 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/