IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 602 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.03.2025 Amardeep ... petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Jeewan Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) As per the status report, the name of the petitioner did not figure during the investigation and he is not required in the investigation; hence, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21st March, 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.