IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32618 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ramdeni Ram S/O Jialal Ram R/O Village- Akauna, P.S- Pakaridyal, Distt.- East Champaran. 2. Phool Kumari Devi @ Phool Kuwar Devi W/O Ramdeni Ram R/O Village- Akauna, P.S- Pakaridyal, Distt.- East Champaran. 3. Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Ram S/O Ramdeni Ram R/O Village- Akauna, P.S- Pakaridyal, Distt.- East Champaran. 4. Manjeet Kumar @ Manjeet Ram S/O Ramdeni Ram R/O Village- Akauna, P.S- Pakaridyal, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Amiri Lal Sah S/O Late Tildhari Sah R/O Village- Chorma, P.S- Pakridayal, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alexander Ashok For the State : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Informant : Mr. Sri Niwas Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 6 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024 registered under Section 96 of the BNS, 2023. 3. As per allegation, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners kidnapped the daughter of the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32618 of 2025(6) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation of kidnapping against these petitioners. The allegation of kidnapping is against co-accused Durga Kumar. It has further been submitted that the petitioners are mother, father and brothers of co-accused, Durga Kumar and this is the reason, they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel has further submitted that when the informant came to know the real fact, he compromised the case. The compromise petition is annexed as Annexure-2 of supplementary affidavit. Petitioners are persons of clean antecedents. 5. Learned counsel for the informant fairly submits that compromise has taken place. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32618 of 2025(6) dt.23-12-2025 3/3 Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 182 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T