Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93112 (ALL)

TARAWATI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/31788/2025 · 2025-09-24

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31788 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondents especially 2 and 3 to take necessary action to protect life and limb of the petitioner and bestowed kind consideration on the application/representation dated 12.08.2025. (b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondent No.4 not to interfere in peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner, so that the justice may be done to the petitioner. (c). Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (d). Award cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner." 3. It is alleged that the petitioner has purchased a land from nephew of the respondent no.4 and the proceeding under Section 34 of Land Revenue Act was initiated on the application of the petitioner which was contested by the respondent no.4 as a guardian of his nephew as his nephew was mentally incapacitated. It is submitted that the respondent no.4 is threatening with dire Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niraj Kushwaha, Sarika, Suresh Chandra Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tarawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) consequences to the petitioner. 4. The question as to whether the respondent no.4 is threatening the petitioner cannot be adjudicated by this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has remedy under criminal law for redressal of his grievance. 5. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. September 25, 2025 SS WRIC No. 31788 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad