PRAKASH NARAYAN MISHRA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/13397/2025 · 2025-09-09
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13397 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj to ensure payment of salary in favour of petitioners in lieu of discharge of their duties, if need so arises, by way of reasoned speaking order by making adjudication therein after putting each and every one to notice and hearing, to be passed within specified period of time."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nabeela Arjumand, Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prakash Narayan Mishra And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj is
directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is
disposed of. September 10, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 13397 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad