IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB 119 Narinderpal Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that despite the petitioner for compassionate appointment recommended by the office of Director General of Police, Punjab, vide letter dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P5), the same has been rejected without assigning any reason vide impugned order da 29.04.2019 (Annexure P6), even though as per the Policy dated 21.11.2002 (Annexure P1), considered, in wake of which reconsidered. 2. The aforesaid hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to having a aforesaid submission the order impugned in the present case the authorities would not address 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned coun IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-24321 Date of decision: 22.08.2025 Narinderpal Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that despite the petitioner for compassionate appointment recommended by the office of Director General of Police, Punjab, vide letter dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P5), the same has been rejected without assigning any reason vide impugned order da 29.04.2019 (Annexure P6), even though as per the Policy dated 21.11.2002 nnexure P1), if there is an earning member in the family considered, in wake of which, he states that The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to having a relook at the matter and decide aforesaid submission and Policy, within a period of impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. The aforesaid satisfies the learned coun IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 24321-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.08.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that despite the fact that the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment recommended by the office of Director General of Police, Punjab, vide letter dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P5), the same has been rejected without assigning any reason vide impugned order da 29.04.2019 (Annexure P6), even though as per the Policy dated 21.11.2002 if there is an earning member in the family such claim can be he states that the matter requires to be facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would relook at the matter and decide afresh taking note of the within a period of 4 months, uninfluenced by , which this Court has no reason to believe in a just, fair and reasonable manner. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. fact that the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment recommended by the office of Director General of Police, Punjab, vide letter dated 15.03.2019 (Annexure P5), the same has been rejected without assigning any reason vide impugned order dated 29.04.2019 (Annexure P6), even though as per the Policy dated 21.11.2002 claim can be matter requires to be facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would ote of the uninfluenced by , which this Court has no reason to believe ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.22 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24321-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 22.08.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.22 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document