Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93085 (PNJ)

SURINDER KUMAR v. PAWAN SHARMA

COCP/3683/2024 · 2025-03-25

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

155 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3683-2024 (O&M) Decided on:-25.03.2025 Surinder Kumar ....Petitioner.. vs. Pawan Sharma, DFO, Ambala ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Govind Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent refers to a fresh order dated 24.03.2025 passed under the signatures of Divisional Forest Officer, Ambala Forest Division, Ambala, whereby, the claim of the petitioner for regularization has been rejected. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to avail his remedies, in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed being not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Rule stands discharged. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 25.03.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.03.26 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document