116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24269-2025 DECIDED ON: 28.08.2025 DALIP KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Tara Chand Dhanwal, Advocate for the petitioner. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus seeking direction to the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as per instructions dated 07.03.1996 (Annexure P-7) and notification dated 01.10.2003 (Annexure P-8) from the date of his initial appointment when his juniors were regularized and release all the consequential benefits together with interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the judgments passed by a Division Bench of this Court in the following cases: Radhey Sham, Mali v. Haryana State Electronic Development Corporation Ltd., CWP No. 8128 of 2000, decided on 03.04.2003; Surender Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others, CWP No. 22564 of 2015, decided on 07.02.2020; and Ashish MEENU 2025.08.29 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24269-2025 -2- Sharma and Others v. State of Haryana and Others, CWP No. 2158 of 2020, decided on 13.03.2024. Notice of motion. On the asking of Court, Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State, who assures the Court that the case of the petitioner will be considered afresh in the light of above-said judgments and a speaking order would be passed within four weeks and a copy of which will be furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. In the light of above, the petition is disposed off, in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.08.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.08.29 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document