HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7521 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant as well as Sri N.K. Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.185 of 2024 (Case No. 230 of 2024), under section 109, 121(1), 352, 351(2), 132, 238 B.N.S. and Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Kuthond, District Jalaun. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the alleged incident, no person has received any injury. Further, the applicant is the owner of the alleged vehicle. At the time of the incident the applicant was not present in the said vehicle. In the alleged video footage, the applicant was not seen sitting in the vehicle. The investigation has been completed. During the course of investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 2.9.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 8540 of 2024. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned Court. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and the fact that in the alleged incident, no person has received any injury, in the alleged video footage, the applicant was not seen sitting in the alleged vehicle, during the course of investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail by this Court, the fact that the applicant had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial. 6. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Rohit Yadav, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by his before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 S.S. NABAIL No. 7521 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad