Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93031 (ALL)

RAVI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/2711/2025 · 2025-09-16

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2711 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking strict compliance of Paragraph No. 4 of Government Order No. 402/1-2-2017 General/2017 dated 01.05.2017 and to take action against respondent nos. 6 and 7. 2. A perusal of the petition indicates that in para 19, petitioner has indicated that respondent no.6 has illegally occupied petitioner's house and demanded exaction money from him qua which he has moved an application to the Police Commissioner, Kanpur Nagar by registered post on 23.08.2025. 3. The very fact that the petitioner has personal grievance against respondent no.6, filing of the present petition making allegations against respondent nos. 6 and 7 by claiming the petition as public interest litigation, cannot be countenanced. The same is therefore, dismissed. September 17, 2025 AHA/Sazia Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak (S.C.) (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Arun Bhansali, CJ.) Ravi Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 6 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AFZAL HUSAIN ABBASI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad