Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9303 (RAJ)

SMT. RAMVILAS W/O MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3536/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17004] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3536/2025 Smt. Ramvilas W/o Mohan Lal, aged about 38 Years, R/o Village And Post Khadipur, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi at Present Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Khadipur Panchayat Samiti Talera, District Bundi ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Kota. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bundi 4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Talera, District Bundi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 22/04/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 14.02.2025 passed by the Block Development Officer, Bundi by which the recovery order has been passed against the petitioner with regard to certain irregularity in the construction work. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to the passing of the aforesaid order, neither any notice nor any opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioner and straightway the order [2025:RJ-JP:17004] (2 of 2) [CW-3536/2025] impugned has been passed, which has violated the principles of natural justice, hence interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Perusal of the order dated 14.02.2025 indicates that before passing the same, neither any notice nor any opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner and straightway the same has been passed, which has violated the principles of natural justice. 4. It is settled proposition of law that whenever any adverse order is passed against any person, at least an opportunity of hearing is required to be given but in the instant case, nothing has been done. 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to pass fresh order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 7. Till one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/18