Serial No. 5 Regular cause list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(D) No. 67/2024 in [LPA No. 208/2024] Abdul Rahim Malik ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Amin Bhat, Advocate V/s Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad Buddoo ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE (ORDER) 29.04.2025 This is a petition initiating contempt proceedings against the respondent for disobedience and non-compliance of the Judgment dated 23.08.2024, passed by this Court in LPA No. 208/2024, the operative portion of which is reproduced as under:- “ For all these reasons, we allow this appeal and set aside the judgment of the writ Court and upheld the order dated 23rd August, 2023, passed by the Commissioner, Agrarian Reforms, Budgam. The matter is, however, remanded to the Tehsildar Budgam for considering the matter afresh. He shall hear both the parties and conduct the requisite enquiry in terms of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder before passing appropriate orders.” Upon being put on notice, the Tehsildar, Budgam has filed the compliance report and has also placed on record copy of the report of enquiry conducted by him in compliance to the orders passed by this Court. The report was bearing No. 46/CC/BUD/025/Court/F dated 15.04.2025. In view of compliance report filed and the enquiry report placed on record, there remains nothing to proceed further in this petition. This petition Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document is, accordingly, dismissed. However, it is left open to the appellant to work out his remedy against the enquiry report if he is aggrieved of the same. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.04.2025 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document