IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CWP-26640-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 30, 2025 Vidya Parkash Gupta and another .. Petitioners Versus The Additional District Magistrate, District Panchkula and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Vaneet Soni, Advocate, (joined through VC) and Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 2. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Saini, Advocate and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocate, for respondent No.3. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that unfortunately respondent No.3-daughter-in-law of the petitioners has passed away during the pendency of the present writ petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. July 30, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.07.30 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document