HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31325 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers; "(a) Issue a writ, nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned notice dated 26.12.2024 u/s 67/2 and 67/5 in regarding plot no. 65/1 Rakba 0.430 hect. and area plot 0.0240 hect. as well as fine of Rs. 53,000/ issued by the respondent no.- 3. (b) Issued an appropriate writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the concerned respondents by means of an ad-interim direction as not to dispossess of the petitioner from his house constructed over the plot no. 65/1 Rakba 0.430 hect. and area plot 0.0240 hect. situated as village- Chandpur, Audherwa, Tehsil-Khaga, District- Fatehpur without adopting and following due procedure established by law, during the pendency of present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court and further prayed to direct the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate, Fatehpur to restore the possession of the petitioner over the plot no. 65/1 Rakba 0.430 hect. and area plot 0.0240 hect. situated as village-Chandpur, Audherwa, Tehsil-Khaga, District-Fatehpur" 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that notice under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been issued against the petitioner for encroaching upon the land of Gaon Sabha. Petitioner had filed a reply before the revenue authorities, which is pending consideration. After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the revenue authorities to decide his objection and conclude the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 4 to proceed with the said proceedings and decide the objections filed by petitioner, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Singh, Sonam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Chandan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 10, 2025 Shekhar WRIC No. 31325 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad