Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92979 (ALL)

SHRAWAN TYAGI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WPIL/2780/2025 · 2025-09-21

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2780 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents not to allow to fix mobile tower in the middle of the 'abadi' of the village. 2. Submissions made are that on account of ill effects of the mobile tower, the residents would suffer and that the tower has been set up contrary to the guidelines meant for the purpose. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perusal of the record, the plea raised pertaining to the alleged harmful effects of the tower apparently is baseless and essentially based on hearsay. There is no contemporary material produced on record to support the allegations made in the petition. 4. Insofar as the alleged violation of the conditions laid down for the purpose is concerned, the petitioner can approach the competent authority and in case the petitioner approaches the competent authority, the competent authority would look into the grievance pertaining to the violation of the guidelines and not the very fact of setting up of the mobile tower. 5. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 Sandeep/Sazia Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Prakash Pandey, Vipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak (S.C.) (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Shrawan Tyagi .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 2 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad