HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10701 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Gautam Budh Nagar to decide the Case No. 712/2022, Raj Kumar Agarwal Vs. KSA Tradex Private Limited and another within the time framed by this Hon'ble court, and/ or pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Gautam Budh Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Raj Kumar Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) Ksa Tradex Private Limited And Another .....Respondent(s) to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 10, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10701 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad