HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33417 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- "i. To call for the records and to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the result of the remaining Practical Examinations of Second, Third and Fourth Years of Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) which were conducted by the University/College Authorities in pursuance of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in writ petition as well as in contempt application. ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the final result of the petitioner of BAMS Course started in Session 2017-18 Batch in accordance with law. iii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allot the student Enrolment Number of the petitioner of the University. iv. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents/concerned authorities to sympathetically consider the grievances and applications of the petitioner regarding declaration of her results of BAMS Course which started in Session 2017-18 Batch. " 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Vardhan Pandey, Satya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shambhavi Tiwari Shaurya Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 3-Controller of Examination, Doctor Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Agra, and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 3, within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Vibha Singh WRIC No. 33417 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad